From Chaplain TIG · A note to our whole nonprofit community

On May 29, 2026, the federal government proposed the largest rewrite of grant rules since 2013. Every nonprofit that touches a federal dollar has until July 13 to comment. That's the window. Three weeks.

Read: about 4 minutes · Act: about 20 minutes
Why This Matters
A grant you planned a year of services around could be ended mid-stream with a single paragraph.
Political appointees could override expert reviewers on which grants get awarded.
New limits reach equity work and many community-serving programs.
The public comment window closes July 13, 2026.
Take Action

Grab the printable one-page overview, sources, and checklist to share with your team.⬇ Download the PDF Checklist
Submit your comment ↗

A friend in the grants world gave up a perfectly good weekend afternoon this week to sound an alarm, and I'm glad she did. Maryn Boess of Grants Magic U made a video asking nonprofits to pay attention to something most of us would never see coming until it landed on us. She was right to raise her hand. What I've done is take her alarm, walk it all the way down to the source documents, and hand you something you can act on in about twenty minutes.Here's the short version. On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget proposed the largest rewrite of federal grant rules since 2013. Every nonprofit, school, clinic, and local agency that touches a federal dollar lives under these rules. The public has until July 13 to comment. After that, the rule moves toward final.That's the window. Three weeks.

What's actually changing

I'm going to keep this plain, and I'm going to keep it down the middle. This isn't about who's in office. It's about how grant decisions get made, and whether the organizations doing the work can count on the funding they were promised.The proposed rule (officially "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," 2 CFR Part 200) would, among other things:
  • Add a political pre-issuance review (§200.205). Senior political appointees, rather than career program officers or peer reviewers, would review discretionary grants before they're awarded, and could override expert recommendations.
  • Expand mid-grant termination (§200.340). Agencies could end an active award with a brief written rationale that the work no longer fits agency priorities. No finding of wrongdoing required.
  • Restrict equity-focused work (§200.218). A new section bars using federal awards to support disparate-impact approaches, and related provisions limit grants that address disparities, which reaches a lot of community-serving programs.
  • Tighten everyday costs. Publication costs (§200.461), conference attendance (§200.432), and professional memberships (§200.454) would need express pre-approval, and E-Verify (§200.303) would become mandatory across awards.
  • Start October 1, 2026, with no transition period for the multi-year grants already underway.

Why this matters to your nonprofit

Strip away the section numbers and here's the human cost.If you run a multi-year program ... housing, food, youth services, health, anything that depends on a grant you can plan around ... this proposal trades certainty for discretion. A grant you built a year of services on could be ended mid-stream with a paragraph. Staff you hired, families you promised, doors you keep open ... all of it sits on funding that becomes harder to predict.Predictability is the quiet thing that lets us serve people well. This rule puts a crack in it.

Don't take my word for it

I won't ask you to trust me, and please don't act on a video or an article alone, including this one. Read the primary sources. Ground-truth every claim above for yourself:

The one mistake to avoid

You may have seen advice to let an AI chatbot write your comment and submit it as-is. AI is a fine drafting partner, and I use it every day. But here's what the shortcut misses: agencies weigh comments by substance, and they screen out near-identical, mass-produced submissions. A thousand copies of the same AI paragraph count as close to one voice. Your own words, about your own community, citing the specific sections that hurt you, count as a real one.So use the tool. Then make it yours.

Your action checklist

  • Read the proposed rule and the NCN change chart (links above).
  • Decide your standing: do you receive, or plan to pursue, federal funding?
  • Pick the two or three provisions that hit your programs hardest.
  • Draft a comment in your own voice, specific to who you serve and where.
  • Cite the exact sections (for example §200.205, §200.340), and double-check each number against the rule text.
  • Keep it under 5,000 characters (that's the submission limit).
  • Submit at regulations.gov under Docket OMB-2026-0034, by July 13, 2026.
  • Save your comment text separately and screenshot your confirmation.
  • Amplify: sign the NCN national sign-on letter and tell your members of Congress.
  • Share this with five peers and your whole team.

A word before you go

I know you're tired. I know the inbox is full, the need never stops, and the last thing you have room for is one more urgent thing.This one's worth twenty minutes.Rulemaking is one of the few places where showing up actually moves the record, and where the smallest organization gets the same comment box as the largest. That's rare. Let's use it.Thank you, Maryn, for the nudge. And thank you, friend, for everything you carry on the days no one sees.

Always in your corner,

Chaplain TIG
Quietly Working